|
UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract : |
| Clinical experience is crucial in developing student teachers’ conception about the teaching profession. They are required to make decisions in specific situations and context hence they need to draw on their beliefs, assumptions, knowledge and experience about teaching and learning. This study focuses on comparative analysis of Teacher Clinical Experience Guiding Principles in selected Teacher Training Institutions around the World. This study involves doing a critical and comparative analysis of selected models and programmes pertaining to guiding principles for teacher clinical experience in selected renowned teacher training institutions around the world. Various type of documents on teacher clinical experience guiding principles has been analyzed including academic programme handbooks, curriculums, academic papers, and others. Apart from that, semi-structured interviews as well as open question survey were administered in selected teacher training institutions. Based on the analysis of data, provisional guiding principles were proposed to be considered by any teacher education institution in designing their curriculum framework in order to produce quality teacher for the future. |
| References |
1. Atputsamy, L. (2005). Cooperating teachers as school based teacher educators: Student teachers' expectations. Australian Journal of Teacher Education 30 (2). Retrieved February 4, 2008, from http://aje.education.ecu.au/issues/PDF/Thirtytwo/aptuphasamy.pdf 2. Barry, K., & King, L. (2002). Beginning teaching and beyond (Third ed.). Tunggerah: NSW: Social Science Press. 3. Beach, R., & Pearson, D. (1998). Changes in preservice teachers' perceptions of conflicts and tension. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(3), 337-351. 4. Blunden, R. (2000). Rethinking the place of practicum in teacher education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 1(25), 1-16. 5. Cameron, R., & Wilson, S. (1993). The Practicum: Student teacher perception of teacher supervision styles. South Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 21(2), 155-167. 6. Cohen-Sayag, E., & Fischl, D. (2012). Reflective writing pre-service teachers' teaching: What does it promote? Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37(10), 19-36. 7. Colin, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitve apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed), Knowing, learning and insrtruction: Essay in honor of 8. Robert Glaser (pp. 453-494). Hillsdale: NJ:Erlbaum. Darling-Harmmond, L. (2006). Powerful teacher education: Lesson from exemplary programs. San Francisco: Joey-Bass. 9. Etscheidt, S., Curran, C. M., & Sawyer, C. M. (2011). Promoting reflection in teacher preparation programs: A multilevel model. Teacher Education and Special Education, 35, 7-26. doi:10.1177/0888406411420887 10. Ewart, G., & Straw, S. (2005). A Seven-Month Practicum: Collaborating Teachers' Response. Canadian Journal of Education, 28(1&2), 185-202. 11. Goh, S. C., & Matthews, B. (2011). Listening to the concerns of Pre-Service teachers in Malaysia during teaching practice. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 36(3), 92-103. 12. Grudnoff, L. (2011). Rethinking the practicum : limitation and possibilities. Asia-Pasific Journal of Teacher Education, 223-234. 13. Majid, F. A. (2016). The use of reflective journals in outcome-based education during the teaching practicum. Malaysian Journal of ELT Research, 4(1), 11. 14. Qazi, W., Rawat, K. J., & Thomas, M. (2012). The role of practicum in enhancing student teachers’ teaching skills. American Journal of Scientific Research, 44, 44-57. 15. Tan, A. (2006). Does Scaffolding Blogging Promote Preservice Teacher Reflection? Examining The Relationship Between Learning Tool and Scaffolding in a Blended Learning Enviroment. (Doctoral Dissertation ). Indiana, United State of America: Indiana University. 16. Veenman, S. (1984). Perceived problem of beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 19(3), 143-178. 17. Villareal, A. (2009). Ten Principles that Guide the Development on an Effective Education Plan for English Language Learners at Secondary Level Part II. Texas: Intercultural Development Research Association. 18. Yunus, M. M., Hashim, H., Ishak, N. M., & Mahamod, Z. (2010). Understanding TESL pre-service teachers’ teaching experiences and challenges via post-practicum reflection forms. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 722-728. |
| This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |